but it's being interviewed by a different magazine each time, and this particular preview has few new clips. The chatroom Q&A part is new, tho.
the Microsoft that pays $50 mil to bail out Take Two/Rockstar of a bankruptcy and gets no respect or loyalty from them in return.
When a company pays that kind of money, it should expect... no, DEMAND, some sort of loyalty.
The Wii does not have the HD capability since it can only perform 480p, so it can't even play Blu-ray just by adding a Blu-ray drive. The Wii also has no HDMI output jack or capability. The entire system needs to be overhaul and redesigned to become Blu-ray capable.
Since the Wii is already so successful, it does not need to be overhauled and resigned for any reason -- for what purpose? To help Nintendo's competitor Sony wins the format war?
It is not Blu-Ray a...
That's an article just a few days ago that nails down the exact date for the price cut to happen: August 8.
Maybe now that there's a leak, Microsoft decides the price cut should be sooner rather than later.
Because PS3 needs an exclusive Western RPG. PS3 has no exclusive Western RPG in the pipeline that I know of.
People like me love Western RPGs but absolutely cannot stomach Japanese RPGs.
Xbox 360 has quite a few exclusive Western RPGs: Mass Effect, Too Human, Dark Messiah of Might and Magic: Elements, Dungeon Hero, Fable 2, Kingdom Under Fire: Circle of Doom, Sacred 2: Fallen Angel, and Two Worlds.
But I can't think of one Western RPG for PS3. Do...
I say the $50 price cut is coming for sure.
The two games that have won all the "Game of the Show E3 2007" awards are not on the list?
"The idea of a handheld rivalry with Nintendo is an irrelevance, ... Those formats don't appear in our planning. It's not a fair comparison; not fair on them, I should stress. That sounds arrogant, maybe, but it's the truth."
"Nintendo knows its target audience, because it has really narrowed that down; and it’s pretty much defined by a boy or girl’s ability to admire Pokemon."
"But I fear that it [Nintendo DS] won't have a lasting impact...
Sony should compensate for all laptops that got toasted by their exploding batteries.
But has Sony done so? NO.
And why was a Sony battery doing in my Toshiba laptop anyway? I don't get it.
He used the original title from the MSN website - the title the guy who submitted this news should have used.
You can bet your arse there's gonna be a recall.
Companies issue a recall when it's a product safety issue, like how the spyware in Sony music CD put personal data at risk and how the laptop batteries can cause fire and injuries to people and properties.
Xbox 360's ring of death is not a product safety issue. You don't die from it. Your bank accounts don't get hacked because of it.
Why even brought up Peter Moore. He's an arse too, and he's gone...
Sony has had recalls. Sony recalled their spyware-infested music CDs and their exploding laptop batteries after customers complained and complained. (In fact, both recalls are still ongoing.)
And even when Sony issued the recalls, Sony had to take jabs at their customers: "You whiners. alright, alright, We're issuing a recall. Now stop complaining and be happy with what we give you." That's Sony's attitude, which is why so many people want to see Sony fails. It's ...
That has to be one of the best looking console games that are coming out this year.
It's still a forum post. It still should not have been reported as "news" and gotten approved. There are RULES and GUIDELINES for reporting news, and people need to follow them.
And it is still OLD. A NEWS should be at least current. It can't be from SIX MONTHS ago. What kind of news is that??
1. It's a FORUM post. It is NOT News.
2. And the forum post is not even new or current. It is OLD. It is dated in MARCH.
3. It is a post in the SONY PROTECTION GROUP forum. How much more can a forum be biased?
This article needs to be reported as FAKE and removed. Reporting an old, biased forum post as "news" (instead of "article") "is a blatant violation of N4G posting rules and guidelines. And the people who submitt...
Microsoft published Gears of War. Under normal contract terms, Epic will have to get the permission of the publisher (in this case, Microsoft) before Epic find another publisher or publish the game itself for any other platform (that means porting Gears of War over to PS3.)
What do you think is the odd of Microsoft giving permission to let Epic port Gears of War to PS3?
Because personally I could care less about Halo 3, Killzone 2, or MGS4, but Mass Effect is the one game that's giving me wet dream.
He was acting like a real idiot too.
But Takashi Sensui handled it with incredible style.
Adults are supposed to care about finance and stocks and investments.
Are you just an ignorant little kid, and you are clueless about what adults do?
Or are you an adult who's uneducated, too poor and too broke to have any money to invest in the stock market?
Or are you an adult who's too dumb and stupid to set aside money and invest for your retirement?
So, which one are you, Vash? How old are you anyway?
Mrs. Chong ...
you made up some really excuses for replaying MGS (i.e., "u can play the whole game with nonstop action. u can play the whole game in first person. u can play the game trying never to be seen. u can play the game 2 see all the items u missed.") You can apply the same excuses for ANY and EVERY game. Using your lame excuses, that means any and every game can have immerse replay value.
Because you use such silly excuses to elevate MGS, that pretty much tells us that yo...